A Eurovision in Turmoil: Unpacking the Controversy and Voting Results


The 2024 Eurovision Song Contest will undoubtedly go down in history as one of the most controversial editions. While Switzerland emerged victorious, the event was overshadowed by political tensions, backstage drama, and a significant disconnect between jury and public votes. This article delves deeper into the chaos, analyzing the voting results and their underlying currents.

A Eurovision in Turmoil
A Eurovision in Turmoil

A Winner Overshadowed: Switzerland Takes the Trophy

Non-binary artist Nemo, from Switzerland, claimed the Eurovision crown with their song “The Code.” The victory stemmed primarily from jury votes, where “The Code” received a massive 591 points. Croatia followed closely with 547 points, delivering an energetic performance that resonated with viewers. Ukraine secured third place with 453 points, rounding out the top three.

A Discontenting Contest: A Look Back at the Controversy

EU Eurovision 2024 was marred by controversy from the very beginning. Social media buzzed with reports of unrest amongst contestants, missing rehearsals, and alleged backstage misconduct. The Dutch entry, Joost Klein, was disqualified on the final day due to an intimidation accusation leveled against him. Irish representative Bambie Thug further fueled the fire by accusing the Israeli broadcaster of inciting violence. The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) has pledged a thorough review, acknowledging the lack of adherence to “the spirit of the rules” by some delegations.

The Israeli Flashpoint: Political Tensions Take Center Stage

The inclusion of Israel’s Eden Golan ignited the most significant controversy. Protests erupted due to the ongoing war in Gaza, tragically claiming thousands of lives, predominantly Palestinian civilians. Golan faced death threats and police protection throughout the event, even encountering boos during her performance. Despite the public disapproval, Israel surprised viewers by placing second in the audience vote and fifth overall.

Decoding the Dissonance: A Jury vs. Public Vote Divide

The Eurovision voting system, a complex blend of public and jury votes, revealed a stark discrepancy in opinion this year. Previously, such a significant gap was rare, with the last identical winner choice occurring seven years ago. Let’s explore some of the most noticeable misalignments:

  • The U.K.’s Dissonance: Olly Alexander, representing the U.K., saw a drastic difference. While juries ranked him 13th, the public vote relegated him to last place.
  • Portugal’s Public Puzzle: Iolanda’s “Grito” found favor with the juries, placing seventh. However, the public disagreed, placing her a lowly 20th.
Also Read:   Dua Lipa Shared a Suggestive Lingerie Bathroom Selfie

Understanding the Jury System:

Each participating country maintains a professional music industry jury responsible for awarding points. Their intricate system involves 12 points for the best performance, followed by a descending point scale, concluding with one point for the least favored entry. The total jury points become a significant component of the overall winner selection.

The Power of the Public Vote:

Since 2009, viewers have held the power to sway the competition through a televised voting process. They can cast multiple votes for their preferred performances, with points awarded similarly to the jury system. For the first time this year, viewers from non-participating countries could participate through online voting, though their collective strength equaled that of a single participating nation.

A Look Ahead: Can Eurovision Recover?

The 2024 Eurovision has undoubtedly left a mark on the competition’s legacy. The EBU’s review signifies a recognition of the need for change. To avoid similar controversies, potential improvements include:

  • Increased Transparency: Clear communication regarding disqualification procedures and a more open response to allegations could rebuild trust.
  • Re-evaluating the Voting System: Exploring alternative scoring mechanisms or weighing the jury and public votes differently could foster a more balanced outcome.
  • Renewed Focus on Inclusivity: The inclusion of Israel highlights the need for a nuanced approach to geopolitical tensions. Prioritizing a safe and respectful environment for all artists remains paramount.
Don’t forget to leave us a comment below and let us know what you think! Share Our Website for Technology News , Health News , Latest Smartphones , Mobiles , Games , LifeStyle , USA News & Much more...